What Are the Differences Between r9 380 2 GB vs 4 GB

As a result of software optimization and clock-speed increases, the R9 380 has been transformed from an existing, uninspiring graphics card into a device that is worthy of serious attention. In terms of benchmarks, it is somewhat faster than the GTX 960, but this isn’t particularly significant when you consider that the gaming experience between the two 2GB cards is very, very close. What distinguishes the 380 from the competition is that the increased performance is matched with a 4GB option that is not too expensive.

The 4GB 380 gives an average frame rate of 33 frames per second, while a 2GB model produces a similar 34 frames per second, demonstrating that the cards’ memory capacity is not a bottleneck in this title. As you might imagine, both the Radeon R9 390 and the Radeon R9 290 gave the same performance, with an average frame rate of 50 frames per second. At 2560×1600, we can see that 2.4 GB of VRAM is being utilized.

This article includes detailed information about the R9 380 2GB and the 4GB. You will find the main differences between the two and the similarities. In addition, the article also has well answered frequently asked questions. The answers will help you understand the topic better and have detailed information. Go through the article keenly.

Quick comparison table between R9 380 2GB and 4GB

What you need to know about R9 380

The Antigua core serves as the foundation for the R9 380. This is a step down from the Tonga Pro GPU found in the R9 285 graphics card, the last card released from AMD’s previous year’s range, and the first to have an enhanced version of the Graphics Core Future architecture.

AMD has not only crammed the old core into a new container, but they have also redesigned the packaging. It has also adjusted the internals to give better performance while using less power, resulting in a slight decrease in the total power consumption.

AMD has also increased the speed of the R9 285’s core, which has been increased from 918MHz to 970MHz. The R9 380 is still composed of 1,792 stream processors separated across four Shader Engines in terms of internal components. AMD processors have used this Graphics Core Next configuration for the past four years, which is familiar to users.

The R9 380 is now accessible with either 2GB or 4GB of GDDR5 memory, clocked at 5,700MHz, which is somewhat quicker than the 2GB of RAM on the previous generation card. The memory bandwidth of the R9 380 is 182 GB/sec, which is somewhat higher than the R9 285’s value of 176 GB/sec. The 4GB edition of the card was used in our evaluations and testing.

Those memory optimizations are the most significant changes in a relatively minor upgrade. As a result, the total performance of the R9 380 has only increased slightly compared to the R9 285 – the R9 285 produced 3,290 GFLOPs of a single show, while the R9 380 achieves 3,477 GFLOPs.

The standard features of R9 2GB and 4GB                                           

As AMD’s official stock frequencies for the R9 380 are 970/5700 (clocks that almost no one uses), Sapphire’s Nitro card provides a little boost to both of those numbers. (In case you’re wondering, the Nitro with a backrest has clocks that are 1010/5800.) That equates to a factory overclock of approximately 1.5 percent, which is essentially the margin of error for most game tests in practice. On the other hand, those slow clock speeds should not be taken for granted.

First and foremost, despite its entry-level pricing, the R9 380 is a powerful graphics processing unit. Even while performance isn’t a significant improvement over an older HD 7950 or R9 280, the addition of 4GB of VRAM helps to mitigate this.

As a result of cross-platform gaming support, many games are now pushing the limitations of GPUs with less than 4GB VRAM. If you’re seeking to upgrade from an earlier generation common GPU to a new $200 card, the 380 performs admirably in its price range.

Secondly, there is always the possibility of end-user overclocking. You’ll need a GPU-specific program to handle Sapphire’s GPUs properly. In this instance, you’re better off just getting Trixx instead of MSI’s Afterburner because MSI’s Afterburner can’t increase clock speeds above +100MHz. Make sure to temper your expectations, as AMD’s GCN architecture has not shown to be nearly as overclocking accommodating as Nvidia’s Maxwell architecture so far.

We completed our tests at 1100/6300 without experiencing any issues, but 1125/6500 ended in a severe system lock, even when seated at the desktop. What our manual overclock would accomplish for you is yet to be determined. Approximately 5–10 percent higher performance, which is good because it’s “free,” though it’s not typically enough to transform a stuttering game into one that’s playable again.

The Sapphire Nitro card is merely a modestly sized piece of hardware. This is a dual-slot GPU, like nearly any mainstream or higher-end GPU (the AMD R7 or Nvidia GTX). As a result, the R9 380X and R9 380 employ the same core design, and the “lesser” GPU still gets a lot of valuable capabilities despite being “lesser.” There are two big 100mm fans to cool the card, which is somewhat unusual to see considering that 60mm fans were the norm when I was growing up.

The vast fans necessitate a somewhat larger card, although the difference is only 5mm in height. They’re also strong enough to generate a lot of noise if you run them at full speed, which shouldn’t occur unless you deliberately boost the GPU and increase the fan speed.

The card is noticeably quieter than a CPU cooler and case fans at factory settings. Even when overclocked to its maximum capacity, it is not noticeably louder than the rest of the system components. Temperatures also remain cool, at least in relative terms; the GPU reached its maximum temperature of 70C during a prolonged play session, so there is no trouble there.

Differences between R9 380 2GB and 4GB

1. Power draw

Our rigorous Crysis 3 assessment scene produces some unexpected results when it comes to power consumption. The 4GB model of the R9 380 appears to be slightly more effective than the 2GB version – this could be due to the different board designs used by Asus and XFX, which could explain the difference. It’s also worth noting that the power consumption of the older R9 285 is more significant, although its clocks are slower.

Although it’s possible that AMD has altered the Tonga processor model for the 300 series update to make it slightly more power-efficient, it’s also possible that the board design is different.

2. R9 2GB features

The R9 380 is a high-performance graphics card released on June 18th, 2015, in the performance segment. It is based on the Antigua graphics processor, built on the 28-nm technology, and available in the Antigua PRO model. It supports the DirectX 12 video standard.

This assures that the current video games will run on the Radeon R9 380. In terms of chip size, the Antigua graphics processor is vast, with a 366-mm2 die area and a transistor count of 5,000 million.

While the Radeon R9 380 uses the same GPU as the fully unlocked R9 380X, which has all 2048 shaders activated, some shade units on the Radeon R9 380 have been disabled to achieve the device’s target shader count. It has 1792 shade units, 112 map units, and 32 ROPs, among other things.

AMD has paired the R9 380 with 2,048 MB of GDDR5 memory, connected to the graphics card through a 256-bit recollection interface. 970 MHz is the GPU’s frequency, and 1375 MHz is the frequency at which the RAM operates (5.5 Gbps effective).

Given that it is a dual-slot card, the R9 380 receives power via two 6-pin power connections, with a maximum power consumption of 190 W. The card’s power draw is rated at 190 W. Two DVI, one HDMI, and one DisplayPort are available as display outputs. The Radeon R9 380 graphics card is linked to the entire system by a PCI-Express 3.0 and 16 bus.

Frequently Asked Questions;

• Is Samsung Galaxy R9 380 2G worth its price?

Although this is the most powerful GPU available, it is at the top of the product stack. The R9 380 Gaming 2G is aimed squarely at the sub-$200 price point that is widely considered to be the sweet spot for gamers, as it provides excellent performance for a relatively small outlay of cash to get that desired gaming experience.

Conclusion

The SU cooling technology, Torx fans, and the MSI Gaming App are all detailed on the back of the package. The R9 380 Gaming 2G is packaged securely in an open-cell foam chassis to prevent shipping damage.

I hope that you can differentiate between the two devices. If you still need more clarification, consult a professional or research online platforms for a better understanding.